People v Sanon

Annotate this Case
People v Sanon 2021 NY Slip Op 05233 Decided on October 1, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 1, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, BANNISTER, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
789 KA 17-00555

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

CAMORINSE P. SANON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



JEFFREY WICKS, PLLC, ROCHESTER (JEFFREY WICKS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (KAYLAN PORTER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Christopher S. Ciaccio, J.), rendered November 3, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant upon a jury verdict of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts) and assault in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of, inter alia, two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [1] [b]; [3]). Contrary to defendant's contention, we conclude that he received effective assistance of counsel (see People v Ramsaran, 29 NY3d 1070, 1070-1071 [2017]; cf. People v Wright, 25 NY3d 769, 771 [2015]). We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and conclude that none requires reversal or modification of the judgment.

Entered: October 1, 2021

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.