Brighton Grassroots, LLC v Town of Brighton Zoning Bd. of Appeals

Annotate this Case
Brighton Grassroots, LLC v Town of Brighton Zoning Bd. of Appeals 2021 NY Slip Op 05214 Decided on October 1, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 1, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
737 CA 21-00240

[*1]BRIGHTON GRASSROOTS, LLC, PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

TOWN OF BRIGHTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, M & F, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA LLC, DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, AND MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., COLLECTIVELY DOING BUSINESS AS THE DANIELE FAMILY COMPANIES, RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.



THE ZOGHLIN GROUP, PLLC, ROCHESTER (JACOB H. ZOGHLIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

WEAVER MANCUSO BRIGHTMAN PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOHN A. MANCUSO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT TOWN OF BRIGHTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS.

WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (WARREN B. ROSENBAUM OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS M & F, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA LLC, DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, AND MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., COLLECTIVELY DOING BUSINESS AS THE DANIELE FAMILY COMPANIES.



Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered February 8, 2021 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and declaratory judgment action. The judgment denied the motion of petitioner-plaintiff for a preliminary injunction, and granted the cross motions of respondents-defendants to dismiss the petition-complaint.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: October 1, 2021

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.