Brighton Grassroots, LLC v Town of Brighton Zoning Bd. of Appeals
Annotate this CaseDecided on October 1, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
737 CA 21-00240
[*1]BRIGHTON GRASSROOTS, LLC, PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
TOWN OF BRIGHTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, M & F, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA LLC, DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, AND MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., COLLECTIVELY DOING BUSINESS AS THE DANIELE FAMILY COMPANIES, RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
THE ZOGHLIN GROUP, PLLC, ROCHESTER (JACOB H. ZOGHLIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
WEAVER MANCUSO BRIGHTMAN PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOHN A. MANCUSO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT TOWN OF BRIGHTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS.
WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (WARREN B. ROSENBAUM OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS M & F, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA LLC, DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, AND MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., COLLECTIVELY DOING BUSINESS AS THE DANIELE FAMILY COMPANIES.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered February 8, 2021 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and declaratory judgment action. The judgment denied the motion of petitioner-plaintiff for a preliminary injunction, and granted the cross motions of respondents-defendants to dismiss the petition-complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: October 1, 2021
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.