Iafallo v Sommer

Annotate this Case
Iafallo v Sommer 2021 NY Slip Op 03761 Decided on June 11, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 11, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, CURRAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
618 CA 20-00936

[*1]DEBORAH IAFALLO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

CHELSEA M. SOMMER, RAY ROMENTAL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, ROBERT W. HENDRIX, FRANCES E. GALARZA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANT.



LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL R. ARCHILLA, BUFFALO (MARK A. FORDEN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CHELSEA M. SOMMER.

NASH CONNORS, P.C., BUFFALO (ANDREW J. KOWALEWSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT RAY ROMENTAL.

CELLINO LAW, LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN W. LOONEY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

RUPP, BAASE, PFALZGRAF, CUNNINGHAM LLC, BUFFALO (THOMAS P. CUNNINGHAM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS FRANCES E. GALARZA AND ROBERT W. HENDRIX.



Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered June 16, 2020. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motions of defendants Chelsea M. Sommer and Ray Romental for summary judgment.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on January 27, 2021,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeals are unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: June 11, 2021

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.