Miller v Rerob, LLC
Annotate this CaseDecided on August 26, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
604 CA 20-00898
[*1]STERLING MILLER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
REROB, LLC, PETR-ALL PETROLEUM CONSULTING CORP., ALSO KNOWN AS PETR-ALL PETROLEUM CORP., ALSO KNOWN AS PETR-ALL CORP., CORTLAND PUMP & EQUIPMENT, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
KENNEDYS CMK LLP, NEW YORK CITY (NITIN SAIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS REROB, LLC AND PETR-ALL PETROLEUM CONSULTING CORP., ALSO KNOWN AS PETR-ALL PETROLEUM CORP., ALSO KNOWN AS
Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Anthony J. Paris, J.), entered July 10, 2020. The order, among other things, granted the motion of plaintiff for bifurcation.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Miller v Rerob, LLC ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Aug. 26, 2021] [4th Dept 2021]).
Entered: August 26, 2021
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.