Matter of Smith v Town of Mansfield

Annotate this Case
Matter of Smith v Town of Mansfield 2021 NY Slip Op 02675 Decided on April 30, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 30, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
466 CA 20-00853

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF NICHOLAS SMITH, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT,

v

TOWN OF MANSFIELD, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.



DOLCE PANEPINTO, P.C., BUFFALO (AARON C. GORSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANT-APPELLANT.

CHELUS HERDZIK SPEYER & MONTE P.C., BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. CHMIEL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Terrence M. Parker, A.J.), entered July 8, 2020. The order denied claimant's application seeking, inter alia, leave to serve a late notice of claim.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: April 30, 2021

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.