Matter of Smith v Town of Mansfield
Annotate this CaseDecided on April 30, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
466 CA 20-00853
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF NICHOLAS SMITH, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT,
v
TOWN OF MANSFIELD, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
DOLCE PANEPINTO, P.C., BUFFALO (AARON C. GORSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANT-APPELLANT.
CHELUS HERDZIK SPEYER & MONTE P.C., BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. CHMIEL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Terrence M. Parker, A.J.), entered July 8, 2020. The order denied claimant's application seeking, inter alia, leave to serve a late notice of claim.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: April 30, 2021
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.