Strife v Wieczorek

Annotate this Case
Strife v Wieczorek 2021 NY Slip Op 01620 Decided on March 19, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 19, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
289 CA 20-00975

[*1]JAMES STRIFE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

ALEC J. WIECZOREK, II, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF SALLY C. JEWELL, DECEASED, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND CHRISTINE M. BERNARD, DEFENDANT.



CAMARDO LAW FIRM, P.C., AUBURN (JUSTIN T. HUFFMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

WEAVER MANCUSO BRIGHTMAN PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOHN A. MANCUSO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Mark H. Fandrich, A.J.), entered January 6, 2020. The order, among other things, dismissed the amended complaint.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: March 19, 2021

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.