Matter of Henshaw v Hildebrand

Annotate this Case
Matter of Henshaw v Hildebrand 2021 NY Slip Op 00654 Decided on February 5, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 5, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
15 CAF 19-00054

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF ADAM HENSHAW, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v

CAROLINE HILDEBRAND, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)



CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

PAUL BLEAKLEY, GENEVA, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Ontario County (Frederick G. Reed, A.J.), entered October 29, 2018 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Ontario County, for further proceedings in accordance with the same memorandum as in Matter of Henshaw v Hildebrand ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Feb. 5, 2021] [4th Dept 2021]).

Entered: February 5, 2021

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.