Pfeiffer v Karlquist

Annotate this Case
Pfeiffer v Karlquist 2021 NY Slip Op 07451 Decided on December 23, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 23, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
1095 CA 20-01510

[*1]NOAH R. PFEIFFER, PLAINTIFF,

v

JOHN P. KARLQUIST, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. ————————————————————-



JOHN P. KARLQUIST, ANNETT HOLDINGS, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS TMC TRANSPORTATION, AND NATIONAL TRUCK FUNDING, LLC, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,LAURIE MARSFELDER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)



SCHNITTER CICCARELLI MILLS, PLLC, WILLIAMSVILLE (PATRICIA S. CICCARELLI OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BENNETT SCHECHTER ARCURI & WILL LLP, BUFFALO (PETER D. CANTONE OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Ronald D. Ploetz, A.J.), entered November 5, 2020. The order denied the motion of third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: December 23, 2021

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.