Kittinger v Sabuda

Annotate this Case
Kittinger v Sabuda 2020 NY Slip Op 01806 Decided on March 13, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 13, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
376.1 CA 19-01943

[*1]KENNETH KITTINGER AND TONI GERACE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v

JAMES SABUDA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANT.



RUPP BAASE PFALZGRAF CUNNINGHAM LLC, BUFFALO (JEFFREY F. BAASE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

RAMOS & RAMOS, BUFFALO (JOSEPH L. NICASTRO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J.), entered October 16, 2019. The order, among other things, granted plaintiff's motions to compel the production of certain discovery.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on March 3, 2020,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: March 13, 2020

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.