Matter of Dressner v Mooney-Tirao
Annotate this CaseDecided on March 20, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
287 CAF 18-01792
[*1]JOSEPH S. DRESSNER, ESQ., ON BEHALF OF THE MINOR CHILD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v
PATRICIA A. MOONEY-TIRAO, SILVIA CHASE, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS, ROSE M. CHASE, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
DAVISON LAW OFFICE PLLC, CANANDAIGUA (MARY P. DAVISON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
JOSEPH S. DRESSNER, CANANDAIGUA, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Ontario County (Brian D. Dennis, J.), entered August 20, 2018 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, directed that respondent Patricia A. Mooney-Tirao's visitation with the subject child be supervised.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Chase v Chase ([appeal No. 3] — AD3d — [Mar. 20, 2020] [4th Dept 2020]).
Entered: March 20, 2020
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.