Rissone v Flanigen
Annotate this CaseDecided on March 13, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, WINSLOW, BANNISTER, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
218 CA 19-00737
[*1]ROBERT RISSONE AND DONNA RISSONE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v
DAVID FLANIGEN, JOHN P. GIEHL, JENNIFER E. FLANIGEN, HARBOR HILL SUBDIVISION ASSOCIATION, INC., AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF HARBOR HILL SUBDIVISION ASSOCIATION, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
LACY KATZEN LLP, ROCHESTER (JOHN T. REFERMAT OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
KENNEY SHELTON LITPAK NOWAK LLP, JAMESVILLE (LAUREN M. MILLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT DAVID FLANIGEN.
UNDERBERG & KESSLER LLP, ROCHESTER (DAVID M. TANG OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS HARBOR HILL SUBDIVISION ASSOCIATION, INC. AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF HARBOR HILL.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Daniel J. Doyle, J.), entered February 13, 2019. The order, among other things, granted in part the motion of defendants Harbor Hill Subdivision Association, Inc. and Board of Directors of Harbor Hill Subdivision Association, Inc., for summary judgment, denied plaintiffs' cross motion to amend their complaint, and granted plaintiffs summary judgment on the cause of action for breach of contract.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: March 13, 2020
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.