Matter of Rager v Ramsell

Annotate this Case
Matter of Rager v Ramsell 2020 NY Slip Op 00726 Decided on January 31, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 31, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
129 CAF 19-00248

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF ROCHELLE RAGER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v

JOSHUA RAMSELL, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.



IN THE MATTER OF JOSHUA RAMSELL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v

ROCHELLE RAGER, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.



DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (THERESA L. PREZIOSO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT AND PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

KATHLEEN KUGLER, CONFLICT DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (JESSICA J. BURGASSER OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT AND RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

MELISSA A. CAVAGNARO, BUFFALO, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Niagara County (Kathleen Wojtaszek-Gariano, J.), entered December 19, 2018 in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, inter alia, granted the petition of Rochelle Rager for permission to relocate with the subject child to South Carolina.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.

Entered: January 31, 2020

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.