Maurer v Colton

Annotate this Case
Maurer v Colton 2020 NY Slip Op 00966 Decided on February 7, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 7, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CARNI, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
1229 CA 19-00694

[*1]ROSEANN MAURER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

KENDALL COLTON, SHERRY COLTON, AND THOMAS COLTON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)



LAW OFFICES OF DESTIN C. SANTACROSE, BUFFALO (ELISE L. CASSAR OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

GIBSON, MCASKILL & CROSBY, LLP, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. WILLETT OF COUNSEL), AND THE HIGGINS KANE LAW GROUP, P.C., FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Mark A. Montour, J.), entered November 5, 2018. The order denied defendants' motion seeking leave to renew their opposition to plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Maurer v Colton ([appeal No. 3] — AD3d — [Feb. 7, 2020] [4th Dept 2020]).

Entered: February 7, 2020

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.