Matter of Landenberg v Akens

Annotate this Case
Matter of Landenberg v Akens 2019 NY Slip Op 06962 Decided on September 27, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 27, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND CURRAN, JJ.
961 CAF 18-01319

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF AMANDA MAY LANDENBERG, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v

EDWARD BRUCE AKENS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, AND CYNTHIA LOUISE STEVENS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.



FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (NATHANIEL V. RILEY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, PLLC, SYRACUSE (REBECCA L. KONST OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (Salvatore Pavone, R.), entered June 14, 2018 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, revoked the visitation rights of respondent Cynthia Louise Stevens with respect to the subject child.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Family Court.

Entered: September 27, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.