Vassenelli v City of Syracuse

Annotate this Case
Vassenelli v City of Syracuse 2019 NY Slip Op 05882 Decided on July 31, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on July 31, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.
445 CA 18-01081

[*1]NICHOLAS L. VASSENELLI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

CITY OF SYRACUSE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, POMCO GROUP, ALSO KNOWN AS POMCO, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AGENT FOR CITY OF SYRACUSE AND SHARON MILLER, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AS A FORMER AGENT OF CITY OF SYRACUSE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 5.)



BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, ROME (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

BARCLAY DAMON, LLP, SYRACUSE (ROBERT A. BARRER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Gregory R. Gilbert, J.), entered February 20, 2018. The order granted the motion of defendants Pomco Group, also known as Pomco, Inc., and Sharon Miller for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy , 140 AD2d 988, 988 [4th Dept 1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts , 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1st Dept 1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Entered: July 31, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court