Copeland v Concrete Applied Tech. Corp.

Annotate this Case
Copeland v Concrete Applied Tech. Corp. 2019 NY Slip Op 03501 Decided on May 3, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 3, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
366 CA 18-02127

[*1]DONALD G. COPELAND, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

CONCRETE APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, MICHAEL SALVADORE, DOING BUSINESS AS CONCRETE APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, DOING BUSINESS AS CATCO AND FERRARO PILE & SHORINGS, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.



THE TARANTINO LAW FIRM, LLP, BUFFALO (ANN M. CAMPBELL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN A. COLLINS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Frank Caruso, J.), entered August 14, 2018. The order denied in part defendants' motion to compel.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: May 3, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.