McIntosh v International Bhd. of Teamsters, Local Union 118

Annotate this Case
McIntosh v International Bhd. of Teamsters, Local Union 118 2019 NY Slip Op 03181 Decided on April 26, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 26, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
323 CA 18-00907

[*1]KEVIN MCINTOSH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL UNION 118, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



TREVETT CRISTO, P.C., ROCHESTER (MICHAEL T. HARREN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

KAVINOKY COOK LLP, BUFFALO (R. SCOTT DELUCA OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Evelyn Frazee, J.), entered March 20, 2018. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted in part the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the second ordering paragraph and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action for, inter alia, breach of contract arising from defendant's failure to provide him with certain benefits, including post-retirement health insurance benefits and accrued vacation pay. Defendant appeals from those parts of an order granting plaintiff's motion insofar as it sought summary judgment on his first and second causes of action. During oral argument of this appeal, plaintiff correctly conceded that Supreme Court's second ordering paragraph regarding the measure of damages should be vacated as premature. We modify the order accordingly and otherwise affirm.

Entered: April 26, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.