Caruso v Chatfield

Annotate this Case
Caruso v Chatfield 2019 NY Slip Op 01943 Decided on March 15, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 15, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.
307 CA 18-00965

[*1]NICHOLAS CARUSO, PLAINTIFF, AND RONALD J. CARUSO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

MICHAEL D. CHATFIELD, LANDSTAR RANGER, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



BENNETT SCHECHTER ARCURI & WILL LLP, BUFFALO (PETER D. CANTONE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

BRIAN CHAPIN YORK, JAMESTOWN, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (James H. Dillon, J.), entered March 19, 2018. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendants Michael D. Chatfield and Landstar Ranger, Inc., for summary judgment as to plaintiff Ronald J. Caruso's claim of a significant limitation of use of a body function or system.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on November 19 and December 17, 2018,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: March 15, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.