Remet Corp. v Estate of Pyne
Annotate this CaseDecided on February 1, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
1252 CA 18-00427
[*1]REMET CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
ESTATE OF JAMES R. PYNE, KATHERINE B. PYNE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF JAMES R. PYNE, AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF JAMES R. PYNE, EDWARD R. WIEHL, AS EXECUTOR OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF JAMES R. PYNE, AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE TRUST ESTABLISHED UNDER PARAGRAPH THIRD OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF JAMES R. PYNE, AND J.P. MORGAN ESCROW SERVICES, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (JANET D. CALLAHAN OF COUNSEL), AND TROUTMAN SANDERS, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
NEIL M. GINGOLD, FAYETTEVILLE, FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Patrick F. MacRae, J.), entered May 25, 2017. The order, among other things, denied plaintiff's cross motion for partial summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Remet Corp. v Estate of Pyne ([appeal No. 2] — AD3d — [Feb. 1, 2019] [4th Dept 2019]).
Entered: February 1, 2019
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.