Wood v Artifact Props., LLC

Annotate this Case
Wood v Artifact Props., LLC 2019 NY Slip Op 01031 Decided on February 8, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 8, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND NEMOYER, JJ.
1233 CA 18-00381

[*1]WILLIS WOOD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,

v

ARTIFACT PROPERTIES, LLC, AND DAVID PERKINS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)



KNYCH & WHRITENOUR, LLC, SYRACUSE (MATTHEW E. WHRITENOUR OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT ARTIFACT PROPERTIES, LLC.

SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (EDWARD J. SMITH, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT DAVID PERKINS.

MACKENZIE HUGHES LLP, SYRACUSE (W. BRADLEY HUNT OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.



Appeals and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oswego County (James W. McCarthy, J.) entered July 26, 2017. The order, among other things, conditionally granted that part of plaintiff's motion seeking partial summary judgment on the issue of liability pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1).

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeals and cross appeal are unanimously dismissed without costs (see Foster v Kanous, 24 AD3d 1205, 1205 [4th Dept 2005]).

Entered: February 8, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.