Singh v Steuben County Indus. Dev. Agency

Annotate this Case
Singh v Steuben County Indus. Dev. Agency 2019 NY Slip Op 00763 Decided on February 1, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 1, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.
1207 CA 18-00412

[*1]AMARJIT SINGH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,

v

STEUBEN COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, B & H RAIL CORP., FORMERLY KNOWN AS COHOCTON VALLEY RAIL CORP. (A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF LIVONIA, AVON & LAKEVILLE RAILROAD CORP.), DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND STEUBEN COUNTY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



HARRIS BEACH PLLC, BUFFALO (TRISTAN D. HUJER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT STEUBEN COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY.

HARTER SECREST & EMERY LLP, ROCHESTER (A. PAUL BRITTON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT B & H RAIL CORP., FORMERLY KNOWN AS COHOCTON VALLEY RAIL CORP. (A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF LIVONIA,



Appeals and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Joseph W. Latham, A.J.), entered June 28, 2017. The order, among other things, granted the motion of defendant Steuben County to dismiss the complaint against it and granted the cross motion of plaintiff for summary judgment on the issue of liability against the remaining defendants.

Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on October 19, 24 and 29, and November 2, 2018, and filed in the Steuben County Clerk's Office on November 14, 2018,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeals and cross appeal are unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: February 1, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.