U.S. Bank N.A. v CCCF Riv. Glen Holdings, Inc.

Annotate this Case
U.S. Bank N.A. v CCCF Riv. Glen Holdings, Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 09187 Decided on December 20, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 20, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
1185 CA 19-00993

[*1]U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF BANC OF AMERICA COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE INC., COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-2, ACTING BY AND THROUGH ITS SPECIAL SERVICER C-III ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

CCCF RIVER GLEN HOLDINGS, INC., KMART CORPORATION, CAYUGA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)



KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP, NEW YORK CITY (KEITH M. BRANDOFINO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

COSTELLO, COONEY & FEARON, PLLC, CAMILLUS (ANTHONY R. HANLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT CCCF RIVER GLEN HOLDINGS, INC.

J. GREENBERGER, PLLC, NEW YORK CITY (JORDAN GREENBERGER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT KMART CORPORATION.

BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE (BRIAN J. BUTLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT CAYUGA COMMUNITY COLLEGE.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oswego County (James W. McCarthy, J.), entered October 29, 2018. The order granted plaintiff's motion for leave to reargue and, upon reargument, adhered to a prior order.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: December 20, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.