Matter of Edwards v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Amherst

Annotate this Case
Matter of Edwards v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Amherst 2018 NY Slip Op 07648 Decided on November 9, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 9, 2018
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ. (Filed Nov. 9, 2018.)
MOTION NO. (824/18) CA 17-01570.

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF MARY E. EDWARDS, BERNARD LEFFLER, CLAIRE LEFFLER, JAMIE L. SMITH AND PAUL SUTTON, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS,

v

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF TOWN OF AMHERST, UPSTATE CELLULAR NETWORK, DOING BUSINESS AS VERIZON WIRELESS, AND PUBLIC STORAGE, INC., RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.