Thuman v Demartino

Annotate this Case
Thuman v Demartino 2018 NY Slip Op 00674 Decided on February 2, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 2, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
83 CA 17-01299

[*1]DAVID THUMAN, JR., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

JILL DEMARTINO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



KNAUF SHAW LLP, ROCHESTER (DWIGHT E. KANYUCK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

STAMM LAW FIRM, WILLIAMSVILLE (BRIAN G. STAMM OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oswego County (Norman W. Seiter, Jr., J.), entered September 9, 2016. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment on her counterclaims and granted plaintiff's "cross motion for summary judgment and motion to dismiss" the counterclaims.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: February 2, 2018

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.