Piccarreto v Mura

Annotate this Case
Piccarreto v Mura 2018 NY Slip Op 00707 Decided on February 2, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 2, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.
209 CA 17-00634

[*1]CARLA L. PICCARRETO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

DAVID J. MURA, DEFENDANT, ANN MARIE MURA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)



ROBERT J. LUNN, ROCHESTER, AND FRANK A. ALOI, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Richard A. Dollinger, A.J.), entered August 29, 2016. The order, insofar as appealed from, established the parameters for an in camera review of the terms of settlement of a legal malpractice action between plaintiff and her former attorney.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (Ciesinski v Town of Aurora , 202 AD2d 984, 984 [4th Dept 1994]).

Entered: February 2, 2018

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.