People v Baker

Annotate this Case
People v Baker 2018 NY Slip Op 00982 Decided on February 9, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 9, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND CURRAN, JJ.
124 KA 15-01058

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

MARY R. BAKER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (STEPHEN X. O'BRIEN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Vincent M. Dinolfo, J.), rendered April 23, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant upon her plea of guilty of, inter alia, aggravated driving while intoxicated.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of, inter alia, aggravated driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [2-a] [a]). Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and thus does not preclude our review of her challenge to the severity of her sentence (see People v Herman, 151 AD3d 1866, 1867 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 1127 [2017]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: February 9, 2018

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.