Warner v State of New York

Annotate this Case
Warner v State of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 07591 Decided on November 9, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 9, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
1106 CA 17-02004

[*1]RICHARD H. WARNER, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS GUARDIAN OF MARY DOROTHY WARNER, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT,

v

STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (CLAIM NO. 098768.)



RICHARD H. WARNER, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF MARY DOROTHY WARNER, DECEASED, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT,

v

STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (CLAIM NO. 105712.) (APPEAL NO. 3.)



THE COSGROVE LAW FIRM, BUFFALO (EDWARD C. COSGROVE OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANT-APPELLANT.

BARBARA D. UNDERWOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (BRIAN D. GINSBURG OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (J. David Sampson, J.), entered May 31, 2017. The order denied the motion of claimant to set aside judgments pursuant to CPLR 4404 (b).

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens , 155 AD2d 435, 435 [2d Dept 1989]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]).

Entered: November 9, 2018

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.