Shaw v Friedly

Annotate this Case
Shaw v Friedly 2018 NY Slip Op 08790 Decided on December 21, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 21, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
1085 CA 17-02158

[*1]LAPORSHA SHAW, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

BARBARA FRIEDLY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, ET AL., DEFENDANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)



BROWN HUTCHINSON LLP, ROCHESTER (KIMBERLY CAMPBELL OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

LAW OFFICE OF JOHN TROP, ROCHESTER (KEVIN MATHEWSON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Renee Forgensi Minarik, A.J.), entered May 22, 2017. The order granted the motion of defendant Barbara Friedly for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint against her.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: December 21, 2018

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.