Bradley v Konakanchi

Annotate this Case
Bradley v Konakanchi 2018 NY Slip Op 06413 Decided on September 28, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 28, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
1042 CA 18-00086

[*1]BEVERLY BRADLEY, AS GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND PROPERTY OF RHOEMEL LAMPKIN, AND BEVERLY BRADLEY, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

RAMESH KONAKANCHI, D.O., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



CONNORS LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN T. LOSS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BROWN CHIARI LLP, BUFFALO (BRIAN R. HOGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Sara Sheldon, A.J.), entered October 17, 2017. The order denied the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's complaint.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on May 8 and 9, 2018,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: September 28, 2018

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.