Miller v Howard

Annotate this Case
Miller v Howard 2017 NY Slip Op 03417 Decided on April 28, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 28, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
857/16CA 15-01921

[*1]ALEX C. MILLER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

KIRK HOWARD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND AMORE'S USED CARS & REPAIRS, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



RUPP BAASE PFALZGRAF CUNNINGHAM LLC, BUFFALO (WILLIAM K. KENNEDY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANCIS M. LETRO, ESQ., BUFFALO (FRANCIS M. LETRO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

PILARZ LAW FIRM, BUFFALO (MICHAEL PILARZ OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS CHARLES HARBEL POST NO. 892 AMERICAN LEGION OF ALLEGANY, N.Y. AND AUDREY J. WILLIAMS.

NASH CONNORS, BUFFALO (DANIEL CONNORS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS KIRK HOWARD, MARI L. HOWARD AND WILLIAM C. HOWARD, JR.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Paula L. Feroleto, J.), entered January 26, 2015. The order, among other things, denied in part the motion of defendant Amore's Used Cars & Repairs, Inc. seeking to compel plaintiff to respond to its Notice to Admit.

Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on August 10, 2016, and filed in the Cattaraugus County Clerk's Office on January 10, 2017,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: April 28, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.