People v Hall

Annotate this Case
People v Hall 2017 NY Slip Op 03408 Decided on April 28, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 28, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CARNI, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
631 KA 16-00659

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

THOMAS C. HALL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



CARR SAGLIMBEN LLP, OLEAN (JAY D. CARR OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LORI PETTIT RIEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LITTLE VALLEY, FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (Ronald D. Ploetz, J.), rendered February 1, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal facilitation in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and on the law by vacating the sentence, and as modified the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to Cattaraugus County Court for resentencing.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of criminal facilitation in the second degree (Penal Law

§ 115.05), defendant contends that he was improperly sentenced as a second felony offender. Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review (see People v Smith, 73 NY2d 961, 962-963), but we exercise our power to reach it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]), and we note that the People correctly concede defendant's point. We therefore modify the judgment by vacating the sentence, and we remit the matter to County Court for resentencing. It is well settled that, "under New York's strict equivalency' standard for convictions rendered in other jurisdictions, a federal conviction for conspiracy to commit a drug crime may not serve as a predicate felony for sentencing purposes" (People v Ramos, 19 NY3d 417, 418).

Entered: April 28, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.