Forcucci v Board of Educ. of Hamburg Cent. Sch. Dist.

Annotate this Case
Forcucci v Board of Educ. of Hamburg Cent. Sch. Dist. 2017 NY Slip Op 04625 Decided on June 9, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 9, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
621 CA 16-01731

[*1]CATHERINE SCHRAUTH FORCUCCI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF HAMBURG CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)



HODGSON RUSS LLP, BUFFALO (PATRICK J. HINES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MARGARET A. MURPHY, ORCHARD PARK, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered March 11, 2016. The order and judgment, inter alia, denied defendant's cross motion seeking leave to amend its answer to assert as a defense that plaintiff lacks standing.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Forcucci v Board of Educ. of Hamburg Cent. Sch. Dist. ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [June 9, 2017]).

Entered: June 9, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.