People ex rel. Haddock v Dolce
Annotate this CaseDecided on April 28, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CARNI, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
567 KAH 15-00620
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. JOHN H. HADDOCK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v
SANDRA DOLCE, SUPERINTENDENT, ORLEANS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARTIN A. HOTVET OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Orleans County (James P. Punch, A.J.), entered November 19, 2014 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that he is being illegally detained on a 2008 conviction in violation of double jeopardy. We conclude that Supreme Court properly denied his petition. "Habeas corpus relief is not an appropriate remedy for asserting claims that were or could have been raised on direct appeal or in a CPL article 440 motion" (People ex rel. Dilbert v Bradt, 117 AD3d 1498, 1498, lv denied 24 NY3d 902 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People ex rel. Collins v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 132 AD3d 1234, 1235, lv denied 26 NY3d 917). Here, petitioner raised the issue of double jeopardy to the sentencing court and thus could have raised it on his direct appeal, but he failed to do so.
Entered: April 28, 2017
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
