Coleman v Chevron U.S.A., Inc.

Annotate this Case
Coleman v Chevron U.S.A., Inc. 2017 NY Slip Op 03378 Decided on April 28, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 28, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
551 CA 16-01910

[*1]BRUCE COLEMAN AND ROCHESTER AUTO MAINTENANCE, INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v

CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. AND TREMARCO CORP., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.



KNAUF SHAW LLP, ROCHESTER (ALAN J. KNAUF OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (BERYL NUSBAUM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered March 4, 2016. The order granted the motion of defendants for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs' claims for public nuisance and loss of sale proceeds and dismissing all claims by plaintiff Rochester Auto Maintenance, Inc., and denied the cross motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: April 28, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.