Coleman v Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Annotate this CaseDecided on April 28, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
551 CA 16-01910
[*1]BRUCE COLEMAN AND ROCHESTER AUTO MAINTENANCE, INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v
CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. AND TREMARCO CORP., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
KNAUF SHAW LLP, ROCHESTER (ALAN J. KNAUF OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (BERYL NUSBAUM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered March 4, 2016. The order granted the motion of defendants for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs' claims for public nuisance and loss of sale proceeds and dismissing all claims by plaintiff Rochester Auto Maintenance, Inc., and denied the cross motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: April 28, 2017
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.