Dominick v Charles Millar & Son Co.

Dominick v Charles Millar & Son Co. 2017 NY Slip Op 03337 Decided on April 28, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 28, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
457 CA 16-01638

[*1]NICHOLAS DOMINICK AND LORRAINE J. DOMINICK, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v

CHARLES MILLAR & SON CO., CHARLES MILLAR SUPPLY, INC., MILLAR SUPPLY, INC., PACEMAKER MILLAR STEEL & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO CHARLES MILLAR & SON SUPPLY, INC., PACEMAKER MILLAR STEEL & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY OF BINGHAMTON, INC., PACEMAKER STEEL & ALUMINUM OF BINGHAMTON CORP., PACEMAKER STEEL AND PIPING CO., INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR TO CHARLES MILLAR, PACEMAKER STEEL WAREHOUSE INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP, ALBANY (GEORGE F. CARPINELLO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

BELLUCK & FOX, LLP, NEW YORK CITY (SETH A. DYMOND OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Charles C. Merrell, J.), entered December 3, 2015. The order denied the motion of defendants-appellants to set aside the jury verdict.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens , 155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]).

Entered: April 28, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court