Matter of Noreault v Olmstead-Grogg

Annotate this Case
Matter of Noreault v Olmstead-Grogg 2017 NY Slip Op 02313 Decided on March 24, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 24, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
427 CAF 16-00061

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF MARION F. NOREAULT AND PAUL P. NOREAULT, SR., PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS,

v

MARJORIE A. OLMSTEAD-GROGG, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND SCOTT A. HALSEY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.



FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (DANIELLE BLACKABY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

PAUL L. CHAPMAN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, SYRACUSE.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (William W. Rose, R.), entered December 14, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, directed that the parties shall have joint legal custody of the subject child, with residential custody with petitioners.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Family Court.

Entered: March 24, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.