Forrestel v Jonkman
Annotate this Case
Forrestel v Jonkman
2017 NY Slip Op 02289
Decided on March 24, 2017
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on March 24, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND NEMOYER, JJ.
345 CA 16-01647
[*1]RYAN M. FORRESTEL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
MARGUERITA M.C. JONKMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)
Decided on March 24, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND NEMOYER, JJ.
345 CA 16-01647
[*1]RYAN M. FORRESTEL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
MARGUERITA M.C. JONKMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)
MARGUERITA M.C. JONKMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.
JOHN P. PIERI, BUFFALO, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Tracey A. Bannister, J.), entered December 21, 2015. The order denied the recusal motion of defendant.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Forrestel v Jonkman ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 24, 2017]).
Entered: March 24, 2017
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
