Forrestel v Jonkman

Annotate this Case
Forrestel v Jonkman 2017 NY Slip Op 02288 Decided on March 24, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 24, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND NEMOYER, JJ.
344 CA 16-01646

[*1]RYAN M. FORRESTEL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

MARGUERITA M.C. JONKMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)



MARGUERITA M.C. JONKMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.

JOHN P. PIERI, BUFFALO, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Tracey A. Bannister, J.), entered December 15, 2015. The order denied the cross motion of defendant seeking, inter alia, an order directing plaintiff to pay defendant $1,231.52 pursuant to the property settlement agreement, and reserved decision of plaintiff's motion seeking, inter alia, an order directing defendant to pay to plaintiff certain amounts under the property settlement agreement.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it reserved decision on plaintiff's motion is unanimously dismissed, and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Forrestel v Jonkman ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 24, 2017]).

Entered: March 24, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.