Vitullo v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Annotate this Case
Vitullo v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 2017 NY Slip Op 02550 Decided on March 31, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 31, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CARNI, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
330 CA 16-01568

[*1]ANITA A. VITULLO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

NEW YORK CENTRAL MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)



WILKOFSKY, FRIEDMAN, KAREL & CUMMINS, NEW YORK CITY (HARRY A. CUMMINS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

RUPP BAASE PFALZGRAF CUNNINGHAM LLC, BUFFALO (MARCO CERCONE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Norman I. Siegel, J.), entered November 16, 2015. The order, among other things, denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Vitullo v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 31, 2017]).

Entered: March 31, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.