Matter of Easley v Ramos

Annotate this Case
Matter of Easley v Ramos 2017 NY Slip Op 02254 Decided on March 24, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 24, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

277 CAF 15-00955

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL P. EASLEY, JR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v

KIARA L. RAMOS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.



ELIZABETH CIAMBRONE, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

AUDREY ROSE HERMAN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, KENMORE.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Mary G. Carney, J.), entered May 11, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order granted the petition for visitation only to the extent of permitting correspondence.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.

Entered: March 24, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.