Time Cap Dev. Corp. v Colony Ins. Co.

Time Cap Dev. Corp. v Colony Ins. Co. 2017 NY Slip Op 02535 Decided on March 31, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 31, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
263 CA 15-01920

[*1]TIME CAP DEVELOPMENT CORP., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

COLONY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANT. ———————————————————————



COLONY INSURANCE COMPANY, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

MELITO & ADOLFSEN P.C., NEW YORK CITY (S. DWIGHT STEPHENS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (KEVIN R. VANDUSER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

RIVKIN RADLER LLP, UNIONDALE (FRANK MISITI OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (James P. Murphy, J.), entered July 21, 2015. The order and judgment, among other things, denied the cross motion of defendant-third-party plaintiff seeking a declaration that third-party defendant is a coinsurer for plaintiff on a 50/50 basis in the underlying action.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Time Cap Dev. Corp. v Colony Ins. Co. ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 31, 2017]).

Entered: March 31, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court