City of Syracuse v Cor Dev. Co., LLC

Annotate this Case
City of Syracuse v Cor Dev. Co., LLC 2017 NY Slip Op 01084 Decided on February 10, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 10, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
139 CA 16-00543

[*1]CITY OF SYRACUSE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

COR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, COR INNER HARBOR COMPANY, LLC, COR SOLAR STREET COMPANY IV, LLC, COR VAN RENSSELAER STREET COMPANY, LLC, COR WEST KIRKPATRICK STREET COMPANY, LLC, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND JOHN DOE, DEFENDANT.



ROBERT P. STAMEY, CORPORATION COUNSEL, SYRACUSE (JOHN A. SICKINGER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

WHITEMAN, OSTERMAN & HANNA LLP, ALBANY (CHRISTOPHER E. BUCKEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (James P. Murphy, J.), entered January 25, 2016. The order, among other things, granted in part the motion of defendants to dismiss plaintiff's complaint and cancelled and discharged a notice of pendency.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order that, inter alia, dismissed its causes of action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and for rescission of a contract. "The right to appeal from an intermediate order terminates with the entry of a final judgment" (Matter of Scott v Manilla , 203 AD2d 972, 973; see Matter of Aho , 39 NY2d 241, 248; see generally CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Inasmuch as a final judgment in this action was entered on February 29, 2016, plaintiff's appeal from the intermediate order, which was entered on January 25, 2016, must be dismissed.

Entered: February 10, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.