Matter of VanLoan

Annotate this Case
Matter of Vanloan 2017 NY Slip Op 09010 Decided on December 22, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 22, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
1375 CA 17-00943

[*1]TESTAMENT OF CHARLOTTE S. VANLOAN, DECEASED. EDWARD C. VANLOAN, JR., AND KAREN DUFFY, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS; ROBIN. JONES, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)



LAW OFFICES OF HARIRI & CRISPO, NEW YORK CITY (RONALD D. HARIRI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

COSTELLO, COONEY & FEARON, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JOHN M. DELANEY OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS.



Appeal from an order of the Surrogate's Court, Onondaga County (Ava S. Raphael, S.), entered September 13, 2016. The order, among other things, granted the motion of petitioners for summary judgment dismissing respondent's objections to probate.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy , 140 AD2d 988, 988 [4th Dept 1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts , 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1st Dept 1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Entered: December 22, 2017

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.