Santillo v Santillo
Annotate this CaseDecided on November 17, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
1354 CA 17-00292
[*1]CAROL A. SANTILLO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
THOMAS J. SANTILLO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
OSBORN, REED & BURKE, LLP, ROCHESTER (JEFFREY L. TURNER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
BILGORE, REICH & KANTOR, LLP, ROCHESTER (THEODORE S. KANTOR OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (James J. Piampiano, J.), entered November 7, 2016. The order denied defendant's motion for, inter alia, leave to renew his prior motion to vacate the qualified domestic relations order entered in February 1996.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Santillo v Santillo ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Nov. 17, 2017]).
Entered: November 17, 2017
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.