Matter of Peay v Peay

Annotate this Case
Matter of Peay v Peay 2017 NY Slip Op 08965 Decided on December 22, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 22, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
1233 CAF 16-00713

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF MICHELLE L. PEAY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v

RONALD E. PEAY, JR., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)



DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

CHRISTOPHER BRECHTEL, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, BUFFALO.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Deanne M. Tripi, J.), entered April 20, 2016. The order, among other things, found petitioner in contempt of court and denied her petition to modify a prior stipulated order of custody and visitation.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Peay v Peay ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 22, 2017]).

Entered: December 22, 2017

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.