Matter of Casper v Soccio

Annotate this Case
Matter of Casper v Soccio 2016 NY Slip Op 08789 Decided on December 23, 2016 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 23, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, DEJOSEPH, AND CURRAN, JJ.
1280 CAF 15-01064

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF STACI L. CASPER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v

JAMES R. SOCCIO, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. ———————————————————



IN THE MATTER OF JAMES R. SOCCIO, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, VSTACI L. CASPER, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.



DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT AND PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL STEINBERG, ROCHESTER, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT AND RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

BRIAN P. DEGNAN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BATAVIA.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Genesee County (Eric R. Adams, J.), entered June 4, 2015 in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order adjudged that if James R. Soccio failed to complete his substance abuse evaluation within 45 days of the court's decision of May 7, 2015, his visitation shall be suspended until an evaluation is completed.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal insofar as it concerns visitation is unanimously dismissed (see Matter of Green v Green, 139 AD3d 1384, 1385), and the order is otherwise affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.

Entered: December 23, 2016

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.