Matter of Sabol v Iannello

Annotate this Case
Matter of Sabol v Iannello 2016 NY Slip Op 08760 Decided on December 23, 2016 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 23, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
1236 CAF 16-00369

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF ANDREW R. SABOL AND VICKI J. SABOL, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS,

v

PAULA G. IANNELLO, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.



PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR., UTICA, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM H. GETMAN, WATERVILLE, FOR PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS.

JOSEPH M. CIRILLO, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, MOHAWK.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Herkimer County (Anthony J. Garramone, J.H.O.), entered September 22, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, granted petitioners visitation with the subject children.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.

Entered: December 23, 2016

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.