Hill v McGinnes
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 23, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
1151 CA 16-00032
[*1]IRENE HILL AND WILLIAM HILL, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v
MICHELLE MCGINNES, JANET S. CANTY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANT.
BRENNA BOYCE, PLLC, ROCHESTER (WILLIAM P. SMITH, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
OSBORN REED & BURKE, LLP, ROCHESTER (MICHAEL A. REDDY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered September 8, 2015. The order granted the motion of defendants Michelle McGinnes and Janet S. Canty for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: December 23, 2016
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.