Matter of Scholl v Mitri

Annotate this Case
Matter of Scholl v Mitri 2015 NY Slip Op 07114 Decided on October 2, 2015 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 2, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.
999 CAF 14-00859

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF JEREMIAH C. SCHOLL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v

BRANDI L. MITRI, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.



ELIZABETH CIAMBRONE, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

THE VALLONE LAW FIRM, PLLC, CHEEKTOWAGA (ERIC T. VALLONE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

KEITH I. KADISH, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BUFFALO.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Deanne M. Tripi, J.), entered May 2, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order directed that petitioner shall have supervised visitation with the subject child.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: October 2, 2015

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.