Matter of Mehta v Franklin

Matter of Mehta v Franklin 2015 NY Slip Op 03719 Decided on May 1, 2015 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 1, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
593 CAF 14-00422

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF AMBER MEHTA, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v

FREDERICK FRANKLIN, JR., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. ————————————————————- IN THE MATTER OF FREDERICK FRANKLIN, JR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, AMBER MEHTA, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M. LoVallo, J.), entered September 30, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order denied the motion of respondent-petitioner for leave to reargue and renew his opposition to a prior decision of Family Court.

BOUVIER PARTNERSHIP, LLP, BUFFALO (EMILIO COLAIACOVO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT AND PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

VENZON LAW FIRM PC, BUFFALO (CATHARINE M. VENZON OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT AND RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

JAMES A. CIMINELLI, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BUFFALO.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Mehta v Franklin ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [May 1, 2015]).

Entered: May 1, 2015

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court